Practice Question for Phl264 Essay Example for Free

Practice Question for Phl264 EssayInfo- the test is 90 mins, you must answer 5 questions, and at least 1 from each section. (Thats 18 mins for each question) There is 1 question from each weeks material. Its a good idea to practise writing by eliminate so you know how much you can write in 18 mins. Section A 1 What, according to Peter singer, is an ultimate choice? How do ultimate choices conflict with other choices? How do you think we should choose when faced with an ultimate choice? 2 What is the distinction between top down, bottom up and reflective equilibrium reasoning?What do you think is the most appropriate form of reasoning and why? 3 Do you agree with Milton Friedman that a coachs primary obligation is to increase profits in accordance with the law (firstly, explain Friedmans view) 4. According to the stakeholder view of business ethics, managers have a broad set of obligations to different stakeholder groups. Explain and evaluate this view. Section B 1 Does adverti sing violate autonomy? (For a question like this, it is stovepipe to firstly discuss the views of theorists in class, e. g.Arrington and/or Lippke, then discuss what you think in a critical way) 2 Do business have responsibilities to encourage the environment? (same as above, regarding Des Jardins, Bullard etc. ) 3 What is affirmative action, and is it a type of reverse discrimination? Can AA and/or reverse discrimination be justified? 4 How do corporations influence the government? Is such influence justified? Section C 1 Pogge argues that we are obligated to sponsor the poor in 3rd world countries because we are partially responsible for their plight.Explain and evaluate this view (Note- the 2 topic this week are globalisation and sweatshop labour- the question could be on either of these topics) 2. What are some of the moral problems of gift giving in the pharmaceutical industry? Do you think fox giving need to be restricted? Why and in what way? 3 Kultgen argues that profes sional codes unfairly elevate the status of the professions to afford professionals higher affectionate status, pay and power. Do you agree? 4 In what situations is whistleblowing morally justified? Is whistle blowing ever morally obligatory?